Do it is thought by you is better for students to function before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, better to write, better to read.

PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, face to face skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as prone to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students can change their higher education course while at uni….

Many individuals believe that it’s safer to learn something in a group instead of individually. Can you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork may be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2
Disagree – Individualism is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Some people genuinely believe that children needs to do organised activities within their time that is free while believe that children ought to be absolve to do what they want to do in their leisure time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it will be unfair to the minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the school
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to buy
-furthermore studies show that the mind operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as for example studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Many individuals say that globalisation plus the growing quantity of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your answer. As to the extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your position.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP Gulf of Mexico, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…

Scientists genuinely believe that so that you can protect environmental surroundings, people must use less energy in their daily lives. However, most people have not changed the real way they live. How come you would imagine lots of people never have taken individual action? What could possibly be done to cause them to become do something?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of the commons
– Collective problem – much easier to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What could be done to encourage them to do something?
– Media campaigns by the us government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……

Some believe that could be the responsibility of people to take care of environmental surroundings. Others say this is the government which should be careful of this environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should care for the environment because:
we have been the consumers, we vote with this wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should look after the environment because:
They have the power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
Supposed to be guardians for the country, which means that collectively they truly are guardians of this earth… not true the truth is

Conclusion
Both should always be doing more!

In many countries small shops and town centers ‘re going away from business, because individuals reference have a tendency to drive to your large stores that are out-of-town. This results in an increase in car use, and it also implies that people without cars don’t have a lot of access to stores that are out-of-town. Do you think advantages of such development outweigh its disadvantages?